The main problem here seems to be a shortage of communication. :/ Also, I agree on the exceptional nature of merging incomplete PRs. -eric On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 3:37 AM Łukasz Langa <lukasz at langa.pl> wrote: > > > > On 4 Feb 2019, at 01:49, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > > > I think this is now up to the 3.8 release manager. > > I responded on the tracker: https://bugs.python.org/issue35813#msg334817 > > I wrote: > > > @Davin, in what time can you fill in the missing tests and documentation? If this is something you finish do before alpha2, I'm inclined to leave the change in. > > > > As it stands, I missed the controversy yesterday as I was busy making my first release. So the merge *got released* in alpha1. I would prefer to fix the missing pieces forward instead of reverting and re-submitting which will only thrash blame and history at this point. > > > > FTR, I do agree with Antoine, Ronald and others that in the future such big changes should be as close to their ready state at merge time. > > > > @Raymond, would you be willing to work with Davin on finishing this work in time for alpha2? > > > - Ł > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ericsnowcurrently%40gmail.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4