On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 4:39 AM Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > What I did (*) is different: I asked to mark Davin inactive and to stop > auto-assigning him on bug tracker issues. Davin was /still/ listed in > the experts list, along with me and others. IOW, there was no "editing > out". Auto-assignment (and auto-add-to-nosy-list, for that matter) is handled by the "components" of the bug tracker, see bugs.python.org/component. The experts list is used just for populating the auto-completion for the nosy-list (that is, typing "multi" in the nosy list entry field brings up "multiprocessing: davin,pitrou" currently). Marking a dev as "(inactive)" in the experts list removes them from that auto-completion. We've long discussed the possibility of rearranging how bpo does auto-nosy/auto-assign such that a reporter can tag the affected module(s) and auto-nosy based on the experts list. That would take significant effort which probably isn't worth doing unless PEP581 winds up rejected, but in the meantime we could easily add a `multiprocessing` component that does whatever auto-nosy and/or auto-assignment we want. -- Zach
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4