I looked how fonforge gets compiler and linker flags to embed Python: it seems like to "pkg-config --libs python-2.7" which returns "-lpython2.7". My PR doesn't change Misc/python.pc. Should I modify Misc/python.pc as well... or not? :-) I'm not used to pkg-config. I don't know if it's common that C extensions are built using pkg-config. I guess that distutils is more commonly used to build C extensions. Victor Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 12:53, Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> a écrit : > Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 09:30, Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu.com> a écrit : > > the purpose of python-config here is not clear. Whether it's intended to be used > > for linking extensions, or embedded interpreters. Currently you are using the > > same for both use cases. > > My PR 12946 removes libpython from distutils, python-config and > python-config.py: > https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12946 > > Do you mean that this change will break the build of applications > embedding Python? If yes, what can done to fix that? > > Provide a different script to the specific case of embedded Python? Or > add a new option to specify that you are embedding Python? > > In Python 3.7, the required linker flag is "-lpython3.7m". It's not > trivial to guess the "m" suffix. FYI Python 3.8 it becames just > "-lpython3.8": I removed the "m" suffix which was useless. > > Victor > -- > Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death. -- Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4