RetroSearch Browse

Sat Apr 20 04:56:44 EDT 2019 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-April/157140.html

I am using concurrent.futures to parallelize independent tasks on multiple
cores once in a while. Each time I have a difficulty remembering the
specific syntax and have to look it up in old code or google. I would much
prefer to be able to find the source through the PyCharm and have
autocompletion. It takes adding two lines to the __init__.py of
concurrent.futures:

(insert on line 19)

from .process import ProcessPoolExecutor
from .thread import ThreadPoolExecutor

I would also guess that it would make the __getattr__ redundant?

Am I missing something or can this change be done this way and would
indeed be an improvement?

Best Regards,
--
Ilya Kamenshchikov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20190420/a8af75b3/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-April/157140.html below:

[Python-Dev] Concurrent.futures: no type discovery for PyCharm