Hi, time.mktime() looks "inconsistent" to me and I would like to change it, but I'm not sure how it impacts backward compatibility. https://bugs.python.org/issue36558 time.mktime() returns a floating point number: >>> type(time.mktime(time.localtime())) <class 'float'> The documentation says: "It returns a floating point number, for compatibility with :func:`.time`." time.time() returns a float because it has sub-second resolution, but the C function mktime() returns an integer number of seconds. Would it make sense to change mktime() return type from float to int? I would like to change mktime() return type to make the function more consistent: all inputs are integers, it sounds wrong to me to return float. The result should be integer as well. How much code would it break? I guess that the main impact are unit tests relying on repr(time.mktime(t)) exact value. But it's easy to fix the tests: use int(time.mktime(t)) or "%.0f" % time.mktime(t) to never get ".0", or use float(time.mktime(t))) to explicitly cast for a float (that which be a bad but quick fix). Note: I wrote and implemented the PEP 564 to avoid any precision loss. mktime() will not start loosing precision before year 285,422,891 (which is quite far in the future ;-)). Victor -- Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4