Le 06/09/2018 à 16:40, Victor Stinner a écrit : > Le jeu. 6 sept. 2018 à 16:33, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> a écrit : >> If we consider fixing these issues to be desirable, then the issues >> should be kept open. Closing issues because no-one is working on them >> sounds a bit silly to me. > > I forgot to mention that closing these issues is my reply to Larry's > call to fix 3 security issues: > > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2018-August/006031.html > > Larry wrote "If they're really all wontfix, maybe we should mark them > as wontfix, thus giving 3.4 a sendoff worthy of its heroic stature." "wontfix" on 3.4 doesn't mean we won't fix them later, e.g. in 3.8. > For these XML issues, the security vulnerabilities can also been seen > as XML features. Loading an external DTD is part of the XML > specification, as well as entity expansion. That doesn't mean there shouldn't be any hard limits to expansion depth or breadth. Function calls are a Python feature, yet we limit the amount of recursion allowed. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4