A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-October/155579.html below:

[Python-Dev] "Deprecation" of os.system in favor of subprocess?

[Python-Dev] "Deprecation" of os.system in favor of subprocess? [Python-Dev] "Deprecation" of os.system in favor of subprocess?Michael Felt aixtools at felt.demon.nl
Fri Oct 26 02:30:23 EDT 2018
Thanks for asking a question that triggered an enlightening discussion!


On 10/25/2018 5:13 PM, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After your feedback, I have my answer.
>
> I understand the your points of view and I don't want to change any part
> of code for os.system and subprocess, I don't want to deprecate
> os.system in favor of subprocess. I just wanted to know your opinion
> about this point.
>
> +1 to use os.system when we only need a call without portability, just a
> quick code.
>
> +1 for subprocess for the portability.
>
> Thank you so much for your patience/time and your explanations.
>
> Stéphane

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4