Le 29/11/2018 à 17:25, Steve Dower a écrit : > > My experience is that the first group would benefit from a larger > _standard distribution_, which is not necessarily the same thing as a > larger stdlib. > > I'm firmly on the "smaller core, larger distribution" side of things, > where we as the core team take responsibility for the bare minimum > needed to be an effective language and split more functionality out to > individual libraries. We may ask ourselves if there is really a large difference between a "standard distribution" and a "standard library". The primary difference seems to be that the distribution is modular, while the stdlib is not. As for reviews and CI, though, we would probably want a standard distribution to be high-quality, so to go through a review process and be tested by the same buildbot fleet as the stdlib. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4