On 11/04, Paul Ganssle wrote: >Oh, sorry if I misunderstood the concern. Yes, I agree that putting this >under python.org would not be a good idea. > >Either hosting it on a hosting provider like netlify (or azure if that's >possible) or a dedicated domain that could be created for the purpose >(e.g. python-doc-ci.org) would be best. Alternatively, the domain could >be skipped entirely and the github hooks could link directly to >documentation by machine IP (though I suspect buying a domain for this >purpose would be a lot easier than coordinating what's necessary to make >direct links to a machine IP reasonable). Yep, I am fine with that. Thanks Paul > > >Best, >Paul > >On 11/4/18 12:16 PM, Ned Deily wrote: >> On Nov 4, 2018, at 12:04, Paul Ganssle <paul at ganssle.io> wrote: >>> Some of the concerns about increasing the surface area I think are a bit overblown. I haven't seen any problems yet in the projects that do this, and I don't think it lends itself to abuse particularly well. Considering that the rest of the CI suite lets you run arbitrary code on many platforms, I don't think it's particularly more dangerous to allow people to generate ephemeral static hosted web sites as well. >> The rest of the CI suite does not let you publish things on the python.org domain, unless I'm forgetting something; they're clearly under a CI environment like Travis or AppVeyor or Azure. That's really my main concern. >> >> >> -- >> Ned Deily >> nad at python.org -- [] >> > >_______________________________________________ >Python-Dev mailing list >Python-Dev at python.org >https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/stephane%40wirtel.be -- Stéphane Wirtel - https://wirtel.be - @matrixise
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4