A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-May/153569.html below:

[Python-Dev] What is the rationale behind source only releases?

[Python-Dev] What is the rationale behind source only releases? [Python-Dev] What is the rationale behind source only releases?Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdonek at gmail.com
Wed May 16 01:55:07 EDT 2018
What does “no release at all” mean? If it’s not released, how would people
use it?

—Chris

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:36 PM Alex Walters <tritium-list at sdamon.com>
wrote:

> In the spirit of learning why there is a fence across the road before I
> tear
> it down out of ignorance [1], I'd like to know the rationale behind source
> only releases of cpython.  I have an opinion on their utility and perhaps
> an
> idea about changing them, but I'd like to know why they are done (as
> opposed
> to source+binary releases or no release at all) before I head over to
> python-ideas.  Is this documented somewhere where my google-fu can't find
> it?
>
>
> [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton%27s_fence
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/chris.jerdonek%40gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180515/192e8123/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4