On 2018-05-07 19:49, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > [snip] > > Would it be reasonable to request a 10 year moratorium on making changes > to the core Python language, > and for the next 10 years only focus on things that do not require core > language changes, > such as improving/bugfixing existing libraries, writing new libraries, > improving tooling, improving infrastructure (PyPI), > improving performance, etc., etc.? > > There are still many companies still stuck on Python 2, so giving 10 > years of breathing room > for these companies to catch up to Python 3 core language, even past > 2020 would be very helpful. > [snip] I don't see how a 10 year moratorium will help those still on Python 2, given that Python 2.7 has been around for almost 8 years already, by 2020 it will have been 10 years, and it was made clear that it would be the last in the Python 2 line.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4