On 28 March 2018 at 19:44, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > 28.03.18 19:20, Guido van Rossum пише: > >> Hm, without thinking too much about it I'd say it's okay to change the >> evaluation order. > > Do you mean the option 3, right? This is the simplest option. I have already > wrote a PR for optimizing old-style formating [1], but have not merged it > yet due to this change of semantic. I can't imagine (non-contrived) code where the fact that a is formatted before b is evaluated would matter, so I'm fine with option 3. Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4