Yes, #3, and what Tim says. On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 11:44 Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > 28.03.18 19:20, Guido van Rossum пише: > > > Hm, without thinking too much about it I'd say it's okay to change the > > evaluation order. > > Do you mean the option 3, right? This is the simplest option. I have > already wrote a PR for optimizing old-style formating [1], but have not > merged it yet due to this change of semantic. > > > Can these optimizations be disabled with something like -O0? > > Currently there is no way to disable optimizations. There is an open > issue with a request for this. [2] > > [1] https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/5012 > [2] https://bugs.python.org/issue2506 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180328/9d10fa8a/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4