That's reassuring, thanks. On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 5:20 PM Raymond Hettinger < raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > This should work. I've seen it done in other production tools without any > ill effect. > > The dict can be replaced during __init__() and still get benefits of > key-sharing. That benefit is lost only when the instance dict keys are > modified downstream from __init__(). So, from a dict size point of view, > your optimization is fine. > > Still, you should look at whether this would affect static type checkers, > lint tools, and other tooling. > > > Raymond -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180325/6fd924f5/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4