On 25 March 2018 at 00:18, Tin Tvrtković <tinchester at gmail.com> wrote: > But is it safe to do on CPython? > That depends on what you mean by "safe" :) It won't crash, but it will lose any existing entries that a metaclass, subclass, or __new__ method implementation might have added to the instance dictionary before calling the __init__ method. That can be OK in a tightly controlled application specific class hierarchy, but it would be questionable in a general purpose utility library that may be combined with arbitrary other types. As Kirill suggests, `self.__dict__.update(new_attrs)` is likely to be faster than repeated assignment statements, without the potentially odd interactions with other instance initialisation code. It should also be explicitly safe to do in the case of "type(self) is __class__ and not self.__dict__", which would let you speed up the common case of direct instantiation, while falling back to the update based approach when combined with other classes at runtime. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180325/c3004008/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4