Baptiste Carvello wrote:
>>>>x=0; [x:=x+i for i in range(5)]
>
> what would be a
> non-cryptic alternative to the above example?
Personally I wouldn't insist on trying to do it with a
comprehension at all, but if forced to come up with a
readable syntax for that, it would probably be something
like
[x for i in range(5) letting x = x + 1 given x = 0]
--
Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4