A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-June/154123.html below:

[Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)

[Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part) [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Wed Jun 27 09:25:14 EDT 2018
Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
> Using this assigned result elsewhere in the same expression (akin to 
> regex backreferences) is not a part of the basic idea actually.

If that's true, then the proposal has mutated into something
that has *no* overlap whatsoever with the use case that started
this whole discussion, which was about binding a temporary
variable in a comprehension, for use *within* the comprehension.

> It depends on the evaluation order (and whether something is evaluated 
> at all),

Which to my mind is yet another reason not to like ":=".

-- 
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4