On 2018-06-22 19:46, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > - the inexplicable (to me) decision to say "for x of array" instead of > "for x in array"; Believe JavaScript has for…in, but as usual in the language it is broken and they needed a few more tries to get it right. for…of is the latest version and works as expected. -Mike
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4