RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 22 12:41:28 EDT 2018 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-June/153987.html

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:13:44AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:

> Honestly it looks to me like the status quo is perfect.

Does this example work for you?

py> (17.1).hex == (17.1).hex
True

But:

py> a = 17.1
py> b = 17.1
py> a.hex == b.hex
False

I know why it happens -- at the REPL, the interpreter uses the same 
object for both 17.1 instances when they're part of the same statement, 
but not when they're on separate lines. I just don't know whether this 
is desirable or not.

-- 
Steve

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-June/153987.html below:

[Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append