Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-June/153944.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2018-06-20 16:42, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I'm wondering what amount of code and debugging is needed for, say,
> Cython or Numba to implement that protocol as a caller, without going
> through the C API's indirections (for performance).

The goal is to have a really fast C API without a lot of indirections. 
If Cython or Numba can implement the protocol faster than CPython, we 
should just change the CPython implementation to be equally fast.

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4