RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jun 18 09:27:34 EDT 2018 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-June/153922.html

On 06/18/18 15:13, Ethan Furman wrote:
> I'm sure we've already had this conversation, but my google-fu is 
> failing me.
> 
> Can someone provide a link to a discussion explaining why the new 
> ordering of dictionaries does not defeat the hash-randomization 
> non-ordering we added a few versions ago?

Hi,
Modern dicts have an array of contents (which is used for iterating the 
dict, and thus iteration doesn't touch hashes at all), and a separate 
hash table of indexes (which still enjoys the benefits of hash 
randomization).

See Raymond Hettinger's initial post from 2012: 
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-December/123028.html

A technical overview of the idea is on the PyPy blog:
https://morepypy.blogspot.com/2015/01/faster-more-memory-efficient-and-more.html

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-June/153922.html below:

[Python-Dev] the new(-ish) dict ordering vs hash randomization