RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jun 18 02:25:36 EDT 2018 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-June/153918.html

I didn't meant comparing tp_fastcall and your PEP.

I just meant we need to compare complexity and benefit (performance),
and we need reference implementation for comparing.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:03 PM Jeroen Demeyer <J.Demeyer at ugent.be> wrote:

> On 2018-06-18 03:34, INADA Naoki wrote:
> > Victor had tried to add `tp_fastcall` slot, but he suspended his effort
> > because
> > it's benefit is not enough for it's complexity.
> > https://bugs.python.org/issue29259
>
> I has a quick look at that patch and it's really orthogonal to what I'm
> proposing. I'm proposing to use the slot *instead* of existing fastcall
> optimizations. Victor's patch was about adding fastcall support to
> classes that didn't support it before.
>
>
> Jeroen.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/songofacandy%40gmail.com
>

-- 
INADA Naoki  <songofacandy at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180618/e0133d1f/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-June/153918.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update