Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-July/154811.html below:

[Python-Dev] Using Python on a fork-less POSIX-like OS

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Using Python on a fork-less POSIX-like OS
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Using Python on a fork-less POSIX-like OS
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Barath Aron <baratharon at caesar.elte.hu> wrote:
> My question is that the _posixsubprocess.c can be prepared to use
> posix_spawn(3) instead of fork(2)? Maybe the UNIX/Linux version can also
> benefit from it, see:
> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-posix-spawn

There is an open issue to add os.posix_spawn() at
https://bugs.python.org/issue20104

--Berker

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Using Python on a fork-less POSIX-like OS
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Using Python on a fork-less POSIX-like OS
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4