A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-July/154721.html below:

[Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580

[Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580 [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580Jeroen Demeyer J.Demeyer at UGent.be
Sun Jul 22 07:02:04 EDT 2018
On 2018-07-22 01:14, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Jeroen was asked to provide benchmarks
> but only provided them for Python 2. The reasoning that not much has
> changed that could affect the benchmarks feels a bit optimistic, that’s all.

The micro-benchmarks showed a clear difference on Python 3.8 (git 
master) between tp_call and optimized call paths.

The application benchmark on Python 2.7.15 shows that the difference 
between tp_call and optimized call paths matters in real applications.

I agree that this isn't 100% bullet-proof evidence, but at least it's a 
strong indication that it might be worth it to start discussing the 
actual PEP.


Jeroen.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4