A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-July/154714.html below:

[Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580

[Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580 [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580Jeroen Demeyer J.Demeyer at UGent.be
Sat Jul 21 14:16:06 EDT 2018
On 2018-07-21 19:55, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I don’t think we can safely assume Python 3.7 has the same performance,
> actually. A lot has changed.

I'm not denying that some things have changed. Rather, I claim that 
those changes wouldn't invalidate the benchmarks.

I am comparing calls through tp_call (A) versus optimized call paths 
(B). I only need to assume that the speed improvements to (A) between 
2.7 and 3.7 are not bigger than the speed improvements to (B).

Most optimizations which have been done in Python 3.x target (B). In 
fact, I'm not aware of any optimization to (A) apart from maybe some 
minor code improvements. So I think it's a relatively safe assumption 
that the speed difference between (A) and (B) did not decrease from 2.7 
to 3.7.


Jeroen.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4