On 11.07.2018 1:41, Victor Stinner wrote: > 2018-07-09 18:01 GMT+02:00 Steve Dower <steve.dower at python.org>: >> The difficulty is that they *definitely* can use the 32-bit version, and >> those few who are on older machines or older installs of Windows may not >> understand why the link we provide didn't work for them. > Let's say that only 10% of users still use 32-bit version. If they > download a default 64-bit binary, I'm quite sure that running the > binary will emit an error no? Such users should be used to such error, > and be able to get the 64-bit version, no? Attached the image of what happens. The message is: "One or more issues caused the setup to fail. Please fix the issues and the retry setup. For more information see the log file <hypelink>. 0x80070661 - This installation package is not supported by this processor type. Contact your product vendor." Pretty descriptive in my book. > Victor > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/vano%40mail.mipt.ru -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: x64.png Type: image/png Size: 103485 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180711/acd99b43/attachment-0001.png>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4