RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jul 7 23:33:18 EDT 2018 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-July/154505.html

Thanks!

On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 8:29 PM Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 8 July 2018 at 12:48, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> > Should we update some PEPs with the new status? E.g. PEP 484.
>
> Aye, 3 PEPs were given the new status as part of the commit:
>
> - 484 (type hinting syntax)
> - 518 (pyproject.toml/[build-system].requires)
> - 517 (pyproject.toml/[build-system].backend)
>
> Checking the other Accepted PEPs, it looks like a few of them need to
> be marked Final now that 3.7 has been released, but I don't believe
> any of them are Provisional.
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
>
> --
> Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
>
-- 
--Guido (mobile)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180707/17eee895/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-July/154505.html below:

[Python-Dev] Making the status of Provisional PEPs clearer