A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-July/154495.html below:

[Python-Dev] Call for prudence about PEP-572

[Python-Dev] Call for prudence about PEP-572 [Python-Dev] Call for prudence about PEP-572Tim Peters tim.peters at gmail.com
Sat Jul 7 12:53:14 EDT 2018
[Guido]

> ...
> As to why you might want to use := in a function call, I could imagine
> writing
>
>     if validate(name := re.search(pattern, line).group(1)):
>         return name
>

When I was staring at my code, I never mentioned the very first plausible
use I bumped into (in code I was actively working on at the time):

while not probable_prime(p := randrange(lo, hi)):
     pass
# and now `p` is likely a random prime in range

I never mentioned it because I expected it would annoy people on 3(!)
counts:

- assigning in a function call
- reducing the loop body to `pass`
- using the binding long after the loop ended

Indeed, for those reasons it wasn't "an obvious" win to me - or an obvious
loss.  So I just moved on.

However, after staring at hundreds of other cases, it does strike me as "a
small win" today - my brain cells have rewired to recognize more ":="
patterns at a glance.

Whether that's a good thing or not I don't know, but it is a real thing ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180707/a6299c32/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4