A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-July/154427.html below:

[Python-Dev] Comparing PEP 576 and PEP 580

[Python-Dev] Comparing PEP 576 and PEP 580 [Python-Dev] Comparing PEP 576 and PEP 580Jeroen Demeyer J.Demeyer at UGent.be
Fri Jul 6 05:50:06 EDT 2018
On 2018-07-05 21:57, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Would it be possible to get outside experts to help?

I don't understand what you mean: to help with what? Designing the PEP? 
Discussing the PEP? Accepting the PEP? Lobbying Python core devs?

The Cython developers (in particular Stefan Behnel) certainly support my 
work. I have talked with them in person at a workshop and they posted a 
few emails to python-dev and they also gave me some personal comments 
about PEP 580.

As for NumPy, one obvious place where some ideas of PEP 579 could be 
applied is ufuncs. However, typically ufuncs are not *called* in tight 
loops, they implement tight loops internally. So I don't think that 
there is pressing need for anything like PEP 580 in NumPy.


Jeroen.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4