On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 7:46 PM Alexander Belopolsky < alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote: > It also appears that there are no cases where = can be substituted for := > and not cause a syntax error. This means that ":" in ":=" is strictly > redundant. > Under your proposal, this is ambiguous: 'myfun(foo=5, bar=7)' -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180705/c8703af1/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4