On 2018-07-05 04:28, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote: > This is as intended. > I wanted to show my summary and Chris' refuttal, with links to both original > posts. Because my letter is much shorter than the originals while carrying the > same message. Also to show that I've made the same mistake, which puts things in > perspective: how an outsider could get the wrong idea. There will always be a long tail of new languages doing any and everything. Which new languages are actually being used? The more limited ones. Static typing, fewer foot-guns. Arguably Elixir should have been in the original list, but it is practically unknown compared to Kotlin, for example. -Mike
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4