On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 03:21:29PM +0400, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote: > was going to tell > > instead of := maybe => better > > := too close to other langs The fact that := will be familiar to many people (especially if they know Go, Pascal or Eiffel etc) is a point in its favour. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_%28computer_science%29#Notation The => arrow puts the arguments around the "wrong" way compared to regular assignment: name = expression expression => name Although personally I like that order, many people did not and I think Guido ruled it out very early in the discussion. Also it may be too easily confused with <= or >= or the -> syntax from annotations. -- Steve
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4