04.07.18 05:42, Steven D'Aprano пише: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:54:22PM -0400, Terry Reedy wrote: >>> results = [(x, y, x/y) for x in input_data for y in [f(x)] if y > 0] >> >> Would (f(x),) be faster? > > There is a deferred feature request to optimize "for x in [item]" as > equivalent to "for x in (item,)", to avoid constructing a list: > > https://bugs.python.org/issue32856 No, this optimization was already made in issue32925. Issue32856 is a different optimization -- it makes such constructions be as fast as a simple assignment. It allows to use an assignment in comprehensions without introducing a new syntax and with zero overhead.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4