On 1/31/2018 6:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:20 AM, INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com > <mailto:songofacandy at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Against the official CPython 3.6 (probably .3 or .4) release I see: > > 1 that is 2.01x faster (python-startup, 24.6ms down to 12.2ms) > > 5 that are >=1.5x,<1.6x faster. > > 13 that are >=1.4x,<1.5x faster. > > 21 that are >=1.3x,<1.4x faster. > > 14 that are >=1.2x,<1.3x faster. > > 5 that are >=1.1x,<1.2x faster. > > 0 that are < 1.1x faster/slower. > > > > Pretty good numbers overall I think. > > Yay!! Congrats for all of us! > > > I'm confused -- I _think_ these are performance improvements of the > Anaconda build over the python.org <http://python.org> build for OS-X -- > so congrats to the Anaconda team :-) > > But a hint that maybe we should do the python.org <http://python.org> > builds differently! Ned Deily is in charge of the Mac build (as well as current release manager). Within the last week, he revised the official builds (now two, I believe) for 3.7.0b1, due in a day or so. One will be a future oriented 64-bit build. The PR and What's New have more. He may not be reading this thread, but will read MacOS tracker issues with a specific proposal, data and a patch. Comparisons should be against the current master or an installed 3.7.0b1. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4