On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote: > And maybe we could even get rid of the "Framework" builds...... >> > > Please do not. These make life easier for doing things the Apple way for > signed sandboxed applications. > > Thanks — good to hear there is a good reason for them. I’ve always thought > that Frameworks were designed with other use-casss, and didn’t really help > with Python. > > For the record, are you re-distributing the python.org builds, or > re-building yourself? > We are re-building ourselves. Seems we've cooked up something not too unsimilar to what Anaconda is doing, but less generic and covering less corner cases. -- Joni Orponen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180131/6a5c3446/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4