On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 06:00:36PM +0000, Paul Moore wrote: > On 30 January 2018 at 17:10, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > > > > This is missing a bit of context. Is this about python-dev? Some > > other ML? > > While I'll admit to being curious about what prompted this, honestly, > it's none of my business - and so I think that Brett's posting should > be viewed as a general reminder, without any specific context implied. But specific content was not just implied but explicitly eluded to: Brett stated that "the last 3 days I have had two situations come up where I was asked for my opinion in regards to possible CoC violations" so it is our business and every one of us should be wondering what we personally might have written that could have been a possible CoC violation, on this or some other list. As Brett says, none of us are beyond reproach. -- Steve
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4