A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-January/151913.html below:

[Python-Dev] GH-NNNN vs #NNNN in merge commit

[Python-Dev] GH-NNNN vs #NNNN in merge commit [Python-Dev] GH-NNNN vs #NNNN in merge commitBerker Peksağ berker.peksag at gmail.com
Thu Jan 25 16:34:50 EST 2018
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
> On 1/25/2018 1:53 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> I would assume it would just go into miss-islington, but before we get
>> ahead of ourselves and design this we need to get consensus that people like
>> the overall idea of using a bot to do a main commits as well.
>
>
> I strongly dislike any idea of making me do more error-prone work when
> merging.

The whole point of writing a bot is to automatize the steps listed at
https://devguide.python.org/gitbootcamp/#accepting-and-merging-a-pull-request
and https://devguide.python.org/gitbootcamp/#backporting-merged-changes
so you won't have to do bunch of manual edits before pressing the
"Confirm squash and merge" button.

--Berker
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4