RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jan 25 13:53:17 EST 2018 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-January/151905.html

On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 at 10:51 Berker Peksağ <berker.peksag at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Mariatta Wijaya
> <mariatta.wijaya at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> That would be best solution (I think it would solve
> >> https://github.com/python/miss-islington/issues/16 too) but it's more
> >> complicated than the extension idea :) I have some time work on it if
> >> you'd like to implement the mergebot idea.
> >
> >
> > +1 for the mergebot! :)
> >
> > New bot or miss-islington's new job?
> >
> > Still +1 either way, as long as other core devs are fine with it too :)
>
> I'm not familiar with miss-islington's codebase. Can we reuse some
> parts of miss-islington in the new bot? If we can, let's implement it
> in miss-islington (perhaps as a new mode?)
>

I would assume it would just go into miss-islington, but before we get
ahead of ourselves and design this we need to get consensus that people
like the overall idea of using a bot to do a main commits as well.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180125/8defc8c7/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-January/151905.html below:

[Python-Dev] GH-NNNN vs #NNNN in merge commit