On 20 January 2018 at 15:00, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 20 January 2018 at 07:49, Mario Corchero <mariocj89 at gmail.com> wrote: >> > I am happy to put some work into this (and Pablo Galindo in CC offered >> > to >> > pair on it) but it is not clear for me whether the next step is drafting >> > a >> > new PEP or this is just blocked on "re-evaluating" the current one. >> >> I think that would be a question for Larry, > > I think you meant for Guido. It's not Larry's language (yet :-). I did mean Larry, but I was unduly vague about the specific question I was referring to (I wasn't sure if Larry might want to repurpose PEP 457 itself for this proposal). It sounds like we're going to go with the option of a new PEP though, crediting Larry with the design, which seems like a good option to me. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4