RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 19 20:24:17 EST 2018 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-January/151846.html

Not so fast. I think a PEP is still needed. This change has more
repercussions than argument clinic, e.g. it affects 3rd party tooling and
bytecode.

On Jan 19, 2018 17:00, "Terry Reedy" <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:

> On 1/19/2018 4:49 PM, Mario Corchero wrote:
>
>> I am happy to put some work into this (and Pablo Galindo in CC offered to
>> pair on it) but it is not clear for me whether the next step is drafting a
>> new PEP or this is just blocked on "re-evaluating" the current one.
>>
>> If someone can clarify we can put something together.
>>
>
> My understanding is that extending the current use of '/' has already been
> approved in principle. I personally think that this just needs an issue, if
> there is not one already, and a PR.  I think we need that, or the effort to
> produce one, to reveal any remaining issues.
>
> --
> Terry Jan Reedy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%
> 40python.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180119/c90b10ad/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-January/151846.html below:

[Python-Dev] Positional-only parameters in Python