RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 19 16:49:08 EST 2018 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-January/151839.html

I am happy to put some work into this (and Pablo Galindo in CC offered to
pair on it) but it is not clear for me whether the next step is drafting a
new PEP or this is just blocked on "re-evaluating" the current one.

If someone can clarify we can put something together.

Thanks!

On 18 January 2018 at 14:40, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 18 January 2018 at 19:26, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
> > Would we be adding yet a third argument-parsing function,
> > PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywordsWithPositionalOnly()?
>
> Checking the docs, it turns out PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords already
> gained positional-only argument support in 3.6 by way of empty strings
> in the keyword array.
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
>
> --
> Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/
> mariocj89%40gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180119/743a7658/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-January/151839.html below:

[Python-Dev] Positional-only parameters in Python