A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-February/152235.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences)

[Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences) - any thoughts? [Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences) - any thoughts?Ethan Furman ethan at stoneleaf.us
Wed Feb 21 22:25:01 EST 2018
On 02/21/2018 06:52 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 22 February 2018 at 08:35, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>> It's too late for 3.7 period, but there's no reason it can't be considered
>> for 3.8.
>
> Something else the PEP needs is a new champion - my original interest
> was to help lower barriers to Python 3 migration, but it's now more
> about the general ergonmics of the bytes type, and I don't do enough
> low level protocol work these days to have a strong opinion on that.
>
> That new champion could be Elias, or else perhaps Ethan Furman (who
> drove the last round of proposed updates to the PEP, which
> unfortunately don't appear to have been submitted to the PEPs repo:
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-September/146043.html)

The changes were still sitting in my ancient mercurial repo.  Copied into the git repo and pushed.

--
~Ethan~

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4