On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 07:47 Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > On 8/1/2018 6:17 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2018-07-31 11:12, INADA Naoki wrote: > >> Any PEP won't be accepted in few month, because we don't have flow to > >> accept PEPs for now. > > > > Is that certain? I haven't been following the process discussions, so > > I'm just asking the question. For example, given that you are already > > looking at PEP 580, would it be possible for you to handle PEP 580 as > > official BDFL-Delegate (even if there is no BDFL)? > > I think this would be a reasonable thing to discuss either here or on > the committers list or both. > If there was an absolute certainty of who the BDFL delegate would be then we might be able to not wait, but without that I don't know if enough core devs will feel comfortable choosing one right now. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180801/b5450460/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4