On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:36 AM Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Victor Stinner wrote: > > In my opinion, the largest failure of Python 3 is that we failed to > > provide a smooth and *slow* transition from Python 2 and Python 3. > Although for some things, such as handling of non-ascii text, it's > hard to see how a smooth transition *could* have been achieved. > Is it a failure if we don't succeed in doing the impossible? I don't think it's your (I'm not core developer at the time) failure. On the other hand, we should avoid many changes (e.g. bytes[index]) when doing such big change next time. -- INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4