A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-April/153236.html below:

[Python-Dev] (Looking for) A Retrospective on the Move to Python 3

[Python-Dev] (Looking for) A Retrospective on the Move to Python 3 [Python-Dev] (Looking for) A Retrospective on the Move to Python 3INADA Naoki songofacandy at gmail.com
Sat Apr 28 08:06:10 EDT 2018
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:36 AM Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz>
wrote:

> Victor Stinner wrote:
> > In my opinion, the largest failure of Python 3 is that we failed to
> > provide a smooth and *slow* transition from Python 2 and Python 3.

> Although for some things, such as handling of non-ascii text, it's
> hard to see how a smooth transition *could* have been achieved.
> Is it a failure if we don't succeed in doing the impossible?


I don't think it's your (I'm not core developer at the time) failure.
On the other hand, we should avoid many changes (e.g. bytes[index])
when doing such big change next time.

-- 
INADA Naoki  <songofacandy at gmail.com>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4