On 26 April 2018 at 04:46, Jeroen Demeyer <J.Demeyer at ugent.be> wrote: > On 2018-04-25 20:33, Petr Viktorin wrote: >> >> Perhaps "m_objclass" could point to the module in this case > > > That was exactly my idea also today. Instead of treating m_objclass as the > defining class, we should generalize it to be the "parent" of the function: > either the class or the module. PEP 487 refers to this as the "owner" of a descriptor (See the "__set_name__" example implementation in https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0487/#trait-descriptors ). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4