Tim Peters wrote: > As a statement in a program (as opposed to typed at a shell), > "a := 3" has the unnecessary (in that context) property of returning > (and discarding 3), so it's better style to use "a = 3" in that > context. That seems like a post-hoc justification. If := were the one and only assignment symbol, the compiler could easily optimise away the extra DUP_TOP or whatever is involved. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4