Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Neologisms are usually written in the > other order: "dead on arrival (DOA, for short)." ;-) Maybe we can make use of that? if (x - x_base) (diff) and gcd(diff, n) (g) > 1: That doesn't work, because the (...) look like function calls. But what if we used a different set of bracketing characters: if (x - x_base) {diff} and gcd(diff, n) {g} > 1: I think that's unambiguous, because you can't currently put {...} straight after an expression. To make it look even more like a neologism definition, we could require the bound names to be all-uppercase. :-) if (x - x_base) {DIFF} and gcd(DIFF, n) {G} > 1: return G -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4