On 04/22/2018 10:44 PM, Tim Peters wrote: > [Guido] >> In reality there often are other conditions being applied to the match for >> which `if expr as name` is inadequate. The simplest would be something like >> >> if ...: >> <something> >> elif (m := re.match('(.*):(.*)', line)) and m.group(1) == m.group(2): >> <whatever> >> >> And the match() call may not even be the first thing to check -- e.g. we >> could have >> >> elif line is not None and (m := re.match('(.*):(.*)', line)) and m.group(1) == m.group(2): > > I find myself warming more to binding expressions the more I keep them > in mind while writing new code. And I think it may be helpful to > continue showing real examples where they would help. > > Today's example: I happened to code this a few hours ago: > > diff = x - x_base > if diff: > g = gcd(diff, n) > if g > 1: > return g > > It's not really hard to follow, but two levels of nesting "feels > excessive", as does using the names "diff" and "g" three times each. > It's _really_ an "and" test: if the diff isn't 0 and gcd(diff, n) > > 1, return the gcd. That's how I _thought_ of it from the start. > > Which this alternative expresses directly: > > if (diff := x - x_base) and (g := gcd(diff, n)) > 1: > return g So I really like being able to make the assignment in the expression, but I have a really hard time parsing it with the name first. Attempting to read just the names first: if diff scan for ending right paren found and g scan for ending right paren oops, found opening left paren scan for ending right paren found resume scanning for final right paren found > 1: return g Attempting to read expressions first: if x - x_base and gcd(diff, n) what's diff? scan backwards diff is x - x_base > 1: return g what's g? scan up and backwards g is gcd(diff, n) Attempting to read interleaved: if skip diff x - x_base back to diff as diff and skip g gcd(diff, n) back to g as g > 1: return g On the other hand, if it were using the "as" keyword: if (x - xbase as diff) and (gcd(diff, n) as g) > 1: return g I would parse as: if x - x_base as diff and gcd(diff, n) as g > 1: return g For me at least, the last is much more readable. Thinking about it some more, the problem (or maybe just my problem) is that I see an "if" or "while" and the I look for the thing that is True or False, and using the ":=" syntax the first thing I see is a placeholder for a result that doesn't exist yet, making me constantly scan backwards and forwards to put all the pieces in the correct place. With "as", it just flows forwards. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4