On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Christoph Groth <christoph at grothesque.org> wrote: > If I had to choose between the above and ":= binding expressions", I > guess I would tend to prefer the latter because they are sufficient, > nicer looking and offer less potential for trouble. But I think that it > is worth to fully discuss the above idea as well. IMHO it should be at > least briefly mentioned in the "rejected ideas" of PEP 572, because it > is arguably the most self-evident way to introduce name-binding > expressions into the language. It's in the FAQ. ChrisA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4