On 04/20/2018 11:15 AM, Christoph Groth wrote: > Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> I also think that if "=" and ":=" both target the same kind of scope, >> there isn't enough new expressiveness introduced by the latter to >> justify the syntactic complexity of adding it. > > OK, but then how about introducing assignment expressions with the "=" > operator but *requiring* extra parens (similar to how modern C compilers > warn about assignment expressions without parens), e.g. Using a single "=" for assignment expressions isn't going to happen. Period. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4